Customs Street Advisors is a full service investor relations firm based in Lagos, Nigeria.

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Services
  • Management
  • Journal
  • Contact Us
  • Valueclear
Feb
19
2010

The Scorecard Aesthetic: Rethinking Annual Report Design

Print This Post

Author:

Obi T. Onyeaso

Categories: Investor relations
Tags: Annual reports, business strategy, Corporate communications, corporate governance, Disclosure, Financial communications, Investor relations, NEXT, Nigerian investor relations, Nigerian Stock Exchange, Online annual reports, shareholder communications, Shareholder engagement

This week on Street Talking in NEXT, I discuss the importance of design in encouraging shareholders to actually want to study annual reports, which is indispensable if they are to understand the business environment, strategy and operations of companies enough to hold boards accountable.

Collecting annual reports is my pet passion. For Christmas, my partner gave me the 2009 edition of the Graphis Annual Report, a coffee-table worthy tome of report design, which I had long fantasized over. At my local post office, I have gained some notoriety for receiving cartons of annual reports from all around the world. I enjoy studying the layout, language, typography, colours, photography, illustrations and paper. At home, I have a room stacked to the ceiling with reports. Just looking at them in that rainbow array is as visually satisfying to me as any aficionado’s art collection.

My current favorite is FirstRand of South Africa’s compact height 428-page 2009 report. Its clean design, intuitive text flow, illustrative charts and judicious use of tables are easy on the reader’s eyes, in spite of its endless length. Best of all, its brick size and spiral binding brings back nostalgic memories of an eighties luxury car manual.

With annual reports, I am partial to the view that a book should be judged by its cover. If the cover is not seductive, then it is dead in water. Perhaps it is permissible for smaller companies to print their reports on cheaper paper, but I think it is inexcusable for big institutions which spend tens of millions pushing their brands annually to use poor man’s leaves. It is a false economy to do so and this has nothing to do with protecting forests. Call me opinionated if you will.

But my hobby does not blind me to the fact that these reports are not primarily created for their aesthetic appeal. After all, they are not fashion magazines. Business first, pleasure next. Glossy paper is not always the twin sibling of good copy. Neither does it necessarily translate to clarity about the business. A well prepared report should give the reader an intelligent overview of the company beginning from the position that he knows nothing about it beforehand.

Nevertheless, providing figures on business performance, the operating environment, risk management, strategy, key performance indicators and executive remuneration should not blur the fact that at its core, the annual report is a presentational document with ‘presentational’ being the operative word. The presentation is as important as the content.

In fact, all the top agencies which publish rankings of corporate reporting (e.g., Black Sun, Bowen Craggs & Co, Hallvarsson & Halvarsson, Investis, Merchant, Nexxar, The Smiths Partnership and Radley Yeldar) all rate the effectiveness of reports as much on the range of topics covered and quality of disclosure as on presentation.

A common mistake many Nigerian companies make is the assumption that the financial statements prefaced by non-material updates by the chairman and managing director are the raison d’etre of the annual report. This is nothing further from the truth. The goal of an annual report is to be read and understood.

Sadly, the pattern of these board member preliminaries reinforces such misconceptions. For example, I have always wondered why chairmen of Nigerian companies waste excess ink on the global economy, fiscal and monetary policies and national politics in their Letter to Shareholders. A cursory discussion is sufficient. At the most, three paragraphs. Four pages is conclusive proof of lazy editing, or worse, fluff.

Annual reports are a great opportunity to revive interest in the company’s equity value narrative. Recently, I read a Logica’s 2008 Annual Report which that swept me off of my feet. In the introduction, the company boldly states that its report seeks to answer six basic questions on the back of every shareholder’s mind. First, what makes our company distinctive? Second, what is our strategic plan? Third, how are we executing our plan? Fourth, do we have the right operational and financial resources to succeed? Fifth, do we have the right strategy in the current market conditions? Finally, how are we getting closer to customers?

How can anyone go wrong with such a clearly defined mission? 

The poorly designed and worded annual report with tepid language, misleading or cumbersome charts, indifferent cover, cramped text and ugly typefaces will always have its readership with overworked analysts and harried researchers at the Nigerian Stock Exchange’s 23rd floor library. They have no choice. They would crouch over scholarly archeological journals if they had to. The audiences that a report should aim for are those investors who still prefer to read about company performance in a newspaper even though the annual report just came in in the mail.

Report design is consequential because if shareholders are not attracted to read reports, how can they know enough to hold boards accountable? There could be something sinister about all these dreary reports by companies. Might it be that they have substituted the words of an infamous racist slur to one that suits their purposes namely that if you want to hide something from shareholders, put it in the annual report? Only heaven knows.

The original report may be read here on the NEXT website.


Related posts:

  1. The place to be: Why the Internet is integral to investor communications I am appalled at the failure of most companies on...
  2. The Value Additive Content of Executive Media Interviews Most public company executives regard media interviews as a distraction....
  3. Not Guilty as Charged: Spare Shareholders the Blame Michel Barnier, the new European Union Commissioner of the Internal...
  4. Under-used & Under-rated: Are Corporate Websites Wasting Assets? Everybody I know remembers where they were and what they...
  5. Reversal of Fortune: Rethinking Cost Cutting in Corporate Value Narration Cost-cutting may become the silent casualty of BP’s Deepwater Horizon...
  • RSSTwitter: CustomsStreet
    • Insecurity not dousing Nigeria's investment appeal reports Bloomberg Businessweek: http://t.co/u04BFwIS . 07:57:19 AM April 27, 2012 from HootSuite
    • RT @smullerz: Looking stupid on Facebook http://t.co/RSTfU3rF.Susanne Mueller Zantop is doing a survey on age relevance in social media use. 07:12:17 AM April 23, 2012 from HootSuite
    • Calling back for basics. After 12 years,Greg Smith explains why it's time to leave Goldman Sachs: http://t.co/xxZof2Ia . Good read. 07:57:16 AM March 14, 2012 from HootSuite
    • RT Someone with access to ThisDay newspaper Twitter acct log-in is obviously very upset with management. @thisdaylive: Thisday is rubbish! 03:39:48 PM February 07, 2012 from HootSuite
    • Fitch unimpressed by Ecobank Transnational's acquisition of Nigeria's Oceanic Bank. Maintains Rating Watch Negative: http://t.co/kLn9ee5H 03:30:49 PM February 06, 2012 from HootSuite
    • RT @annicastrahner: Just downloaded RT @Box_IR: Executive summary of annual IR survey 2011. http://t.co/uhtM8DL6 #irchat 03:28:00 PM February 06, 2012 from HootSuite
  • View Customs Street Advisors shared bookmarks on Delicious      Read Customs Street Advisors shared documents on Scribd      Subscribe to Customs Street Journal RSS
  • Archives

    • July 2011 (1)
    • May 2011 (1)
    • December 2010 (1)
    • October 2010 (1)
    • August 2010 (1)
    • July 2010 (5)
    • June 2010 (6)
    • May 2010 (9)
    • April 2010 (8)
    • March 2010 (8)
    • February 2010 (8)
    • January 2010 (5)
    • December 2009 (4)
    • November 2009 (4)
    • October 2009 (5)
    • September 2009 (3)
    • August 2009 (2)
    • July 2009 (2)
    • June 2009 (1)
    • May 2009 (7)
    • April 2009 (3)
    • March 2009 (1)
    • February 2009 (1)
    • January 2009 (17)
    • December 2008 (2)
  • Categories

    • Corporate communications (42)
    • Engaged Reading (3)
    • General Category (1)
    • Investor relations (93)
    • Issues Trail (4)
    • Social media (4)
    • Uncategorized (1)
  • Tags

      Access Bank Activist shareholders Alrroya analyst coverage analysts Arunma Oteh Bank PHB Banks blogs business strategy CBN Central Bank of Nigeria Corporate communications Corporate Finance corporate governance credit crisis crisis communications Daisy Ekineh Deal PR Financial communications Financial institutions Financial PR financial press Independent Shareholders' Association of Nigeria Intercontinental Bank investor communities Investor relations IPO issues management Lamido Sanusi M&A Markets NEXT Nigerian investor relations Nigerian Shareholder Associations Nigerian Stock Exchange NSE Oceanic Bank online IR Professor Ndi Okereke-Onyiuke SEC Securities and Exchange Commission shareholder communications Shareholder engagement Social media social networks Spring Bank Stock market forums Sunny Nwosu web 2.0
Customs Street Advisors is registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission of Nigeria (RC 752995)
Privacy Policy |  Terms of Use |  Disclaimer